The relevance of J.G.Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre (towards the 260th anniversary of the thinker’s birth)

260 years since the birth of Fichte give a good reason to turn his Wissenschaftslehre, which, together with Kant’s critical philosophy, is bridge from past future state philosophical and scientific culture. The first second parts article explore little-known Russian historians philosophy controversy about spirit letter teaching, which flared up at end 18th century in Germany had discrepancy between intention metaphysics into science negative result all three “Critics” this point. In dispute Reinhold, Kreuzer, Schulze (Enesidem), Schmid Krug, who interpreted as based on sensory-rational experience, Friedrich Schlegel, Schelling Hegel acted united front side Fichte. Their consolidation was needed order, struggle against quasi-philosophy their time, support movement started by Kant continued reveal basis neutralizing dogmatic skeptical conclusions naive-realistic theory knowledge. third part article, for instructive clarified it shown that innovations late period Fichte’s work do not concern monistic principle but affect has become thinker’s attitude history philosophy. It concluded need overcome ahistorism does detract, but, contrary, only increases relevance Wissenschaftslehre one most important moments historical development logical method.